Hartley Parish Plan
Background - Proposed Swimming Pool in 1998

Return to homepage

The Gravesend Reporter of 2 April 1998 reported that Sevenoaks Council were consulting in Hartley and New Ash Green about whether people wanted a swimming pool here. I wrote to the council under the Freedom of Information Act for more details, and they have sent me the Feasibility Study Report.

Overall the report found in favour of a small local pool (4 lane pool, 25m long), which was endorsed as a priority by the then council. However local response to questionnaires was not high, and regional bodies were not very supportive of the idea. Those who did reply tended to be in favour, but that may not be too much of a surprise.

As an aside the papers also note the need of an additional hall in Hartley.

The report's findings are set out below.

Current Usage of Pools

Once again the majority of people in the north-east of Sevenoaks District use the facilities outside Sevenoaks District. Regrettably the report does not give specific figures but says the most popular destinations are first Cygnet (Northfleet), followed by Cascades (Gravesend) and White Oak (Swanley). Only 16% in the street survey go to Swanley. Other pools mentioned are Fairfield (Dartford) and Larkfield (Tonbridge).

They listed the following pools in the area:

Responses to consultation Locations Considered (although all green belt they assumed no planning problems) Projected costings and use

They projected a total construction cost of £1,356,320 with an annual revenue cost of £111,070, based on 80,000 visits per year. This is similar to what Edenbridge Pool cost to build and run.

Overall conclusions of study

Sevenoaks Council's attitude to the proposed pool

The Leisure Committee of the council on 29 October 1998, endorsed the need for a swimming pool here. They accepted no funds were available at present but it would become top priority when there were. Political control changed in 1999 and since then little more appears to have been heard, but I am not sure though whether it is particularly a party political matter.

Peter Mayer
February 2005